Under the logo on every Ripost page there was a strip of grey chips. #lista, #kosova, #7, #foto, #listat, #kenga, #dites, #lajme, #prishtina, #9, #fotografi. The label to their left read TEMAT N’QARKULLIM, topics in circulation.

That row was our navigation, and it is the single design decision from Ripost I still defend hardest.
Category menus describe the newsroom, not the reader
Every portal has the same menu. Politics, Economy, Culture, Sport, World. It is not a reader model. It is an org chart with links on it, inherited from a newspaper where those words described which desk a story came from.
Nobody browses that way. Nobody wakes up wanting Culture. They want the thing everyone is talking about, or the specific thing they came for, or something to do for four minutes.
Categories also age badly. They are fixed, so they cannot tell you anything about right now. The Politics link means exactly the same thing on a dead Tuesday as it does on election night.
Topics in circulation
A live topic bar says something a menu cannot: this is what is moving today.
Look at what was actually in the bar. #kosova and #prishtina, which are places people care about. #lajme, news. #foto and #fotografi, which are formats. #kenga, songs. And then #lista, #listat, #7 and #9, which are not subjects at all. They are shapes. A list. A seven-item list. A nine-item list.
That is a reader’s taxonomy, not an editor’s. People do choose by shape. Somebody with four minutes on a bus wants a list, and they do not much care whether it is a list about Prishtina or about shoes. Giving them a way to say “more of that shape” is a legitimate journey, and no category menu in Kosovo offered it.
What it changed downstream
Once the tag is the main road, other things follow.
Every article needs to belong to several tags rather than exactly one category, so the content model changes. Tag pages stop being the dumping ground they are on most sites and become real destinations that need a layout. And the bar itself becomes editorial surface: what sits in it is a decision, made daily, about where you want attention to go.
It also gave the site a memory of itself. A story published three weeks ago is not stranded once it falls off the front page, because it still lives on a tag that is still in circulation.
The failure mode
I will be honest about the cost. Tag-first navigation degrades fast if nobody grooms it.
You get #lista and #listat sitting next to each other, which is exactly what happened to us, and #7 and #9 as separate chips when they are the same idea. Every near-duplicate splits the traffic and makes both pages weaker. A category tree has forty entries and stays tidy by being small. A tag system has hundreds and requires actual maintenance: merging, redirecting, deciding what is allowed to exist.
That is the trade. A menu is tidy and tells you nothing. A live topic bar tells you what is happening and demands to be looked after. For a site whose entire premise was circulation, the second one was the only honest choice.
Write a comment